Re: [PATCH] clk: Simplify __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider()

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>]

On 08/25, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider() is confusing because it will
> return EPROBE_DEFER if there isn't a ->get() or ->get_hw()
> function pointer in a provider. That's just a bug though, and we
> used to NULL pointer exception when ->get() was missing anyway,
> so let's make this more obvious that they're not optional. The
> assumption is that most providers will implement ->get_hw() so we
> only fallback to the ->get() function if necessary. This
> clarifies the intent and removes any possibility of probe defer
> happening if clk providers are buggy.
> 
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project