From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755269AbcH1FuI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 28 Aug 2016 01:50:08 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]:35889 "EHLO
        mail-lf0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751220AbcH1FuG (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 28 Aug 2016 01:50:06 -0400
From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
Reply-To: arekm@maven.pl
Organization: Do not reply to gmail address. Write to arekm@maven.pl instead.
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:50:01 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.7.1; KDE/4.14.22; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
        "Ralf-Peter Rohbeck" <Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@quantum.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20160822093249.GA14916@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160823074339.GB23577@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160825071103.GC4230@dhcp22.suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20160825071103.GC4230@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <201608280750.02034.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id u7S5oCwU017200

On Thursday 25 of August 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 23-08-16 09:43:39, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 22-08-16 15:05:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:42:28 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> 
wrote:
> > > > Of course, if Linus/Andrew doesn't like to take those compaction
> > > > improvements this late then I will ask to merge the partial revert to
> > > > Linus tree as well and then there is not much to discuss.
> > > 
> > > This sounds like the prudent option.  Can we get 4.8 working
> > > well-enough, backport that into 4.7.x and worry about the fancier stuff
> > > for 4.9?
> > 
> > OK, fair enough.
> > 
> > I would really appreciate if the original reporters could retest with
> > this patch on top of the current Linus tree.
> 
> Any luck with the testing of this patch?

Here my "rm -rf && cp -al" 10x in parallel test finished without OOM, so

Tested-by: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )