public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Cc: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] usb: ulpi: remove "dev" field from struct ulpi_ops
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:15:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160829111459.GA14856@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a8fwdn1a.fsf@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:58:25AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com> writes:
> > struct ulpi_ops is defined as follows:
> >
> > struct ulpi_ops {
> >         struct device *dev;
> >         int (*read)(struct ulpi_ops *ops, u8 addr);
> >         int (*write)(struct ulpi_ops *ops, u8 addr, u8 val);
> > };
> >
> > Upon calling ulpi_register_interface(), the struct device argument is
> > put inside the struct ulpi_ops argument's dev field. Later, when
> > calling the actual read()/write() operations, the struct ulpi_ops is
> > passed to them and they use the stored device to access whatever
> > private data they need.
> >
> > This means that if one wishes to reuse the same oprations for multiple
> > interfaces (e.g if we have multiple instances of the same controller),
> > any but the last interface registered will not operate properly (and
> > the one that does work will be at the mercy of the others to not mess
> > it up).
> >
> > I understand that barely any driver uses this bus right now, but I
> > suppose it's there to be used at some point. We might as well fix the
> > design here before we hit this bug.
> >
> > This series fixes this by passing the given struct device directly to
> > the operation functions via ulpi->dev.parent in ulpi_read() and
> > ulpi_write(). It also changes the operations struct to be constant
> > since now nobody has a reason to modify it.
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> >  * Split the actual api change into multiple patch as per Felipe Balbi's
> >    suggestion. The series now first adds the new api, then migrates
> >    everything to use and only then removes the old api.
> >
> > Changes from v2:
> >  * Merge patches 2 and 3 (now patch 2)
> >  * Merge patches 5 and 6 (now patch 4)
> >  * Remove comment documenting the removed dev field in struct ulpi_ops
> >
> > Tal Shorer (8):
> >   usb: ulpi: move setting of ulpi->dev parent up in ulpi_register()
> >   usb: ulpi: add new api functions, {read|write}_dev()
> >   usb: dwc3: ulpi: use new api
> >   usb: ulpi: remove calls to old api callbacks
> >   usb: ulpi: rename operations {read|write}_dev to simply {read|write}
> >   usb: ulpi: remove "dev" field from struct ulpi_ops
> >   usb: ulpi: make ops struct constant
> >   usb: dwc3: ulpi: make dwc3_ulpi_ops constant
> 
> I have no idea how to apply these :-) Many of the patches touch dwc3,
> but some touch common ulpi. Greg, is it okay if I take the entire series
> and send it to you during my for-next pull request?

Sure, that works for me.

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2016-08-29 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-16 16:04 [PATCH v3 0/8] usb: ulpi: remove "dev" field from struct ulpi_ops Tal Shorer
2016-08-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] usb: ulpi: move setting of ulpi->dev parent up in ulpi_register() Tal Shorer
2016-08-17 11:11   ` Heikki Krogerus
2016-08-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] usb: ulpi: add new api functions, {read|write}_dev() Tal Shorer
2016-08-17 11:11   ` Heikki Krogerus
2016-08-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] usb: dwc3: ulpi: use new api Tal Shorer
2016-08-17 11:14   ` Heikki Krogerus
2016-08-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] usb: ulpi: remove calls to old api callbacks Tal Shorer
2016-08-17 11:14   ` Heikki Krogerus
2016-08-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] usb: ulpi: rename operations {read|write}_dev to simply {read|write} Tal Shorer
2016-08-17 11:15   ` Heikki Krogerus
2016-08-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] usb: ulpi: remove "dev" field from struct ulpi_ops Tal Shorer
2016-08-17 11:15   ` Heikki Krogerus
2016-08-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] usb: ulpi: make ops struct constant Tal Shorer
2016-08-17 11:16   ` Heikki Krogerus
2016-08-16 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] usb: dwc3: ulpi: make dwc3_ulpi_ops constant Tal Shorer
2016-08-17 11:17   ` Heikki Krogerus
2016-08-29  7:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] usb: ulpi: remove "dev" field from struct ulpi_ops Felipe Balbi
2016-08-29 11:15   ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160829111459.GA14856@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tal.shorer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox