From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933255AbcH2OOQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:14:16 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:2735 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932346AbcH2OOO (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:14:14 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,596,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="754668579" Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:07:39 +0300 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Vincent Palatin , Greg KH , Oliver Neukum , Felipe Balbi , Bin Gao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 1/3] usb: USB Type-C connector class Message-ID: <20160829140739.GA10151@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <1471867560-93494-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <1471867560-93494-2-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20160825115958.GE12117@kuha.fi.intel.com> <20160826140710.GG12117@kuha.fi.intel.com> <5f073751-a725-09a2-79be-49709bcd2cf9@roeck-us.net> <20160829134303.GB16924@kuha.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160829134303.GB16924@kuha.fi.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Guenter, > > Overall this is quite vague and, especially for chargers, most of the time > > misses the point. > > > > I would really prefer if we could stay closer to the specification in this > > case, and not try to merge multiple orthogonal attributes into one. > > OK. So what would you propose? I'm actually only conserned about the accessory case, as there we are really not a source/sink/DRP, nor are we DPF/UFP/DRD. Should we use this attribute to only express if the type of the partner is "normal" or an accessory? Thanks, -- heikki