public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>,
	Rom Lemarchand <romlem@google.com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:21:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160831052102.GA14571@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160809095112.GG30192@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

Peter,

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:51:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Currently the percpu-rwsem switches to (global) atomic ops while a
> writer is waiting; which could be quite a while and slows down
> releasing the readers.
> 
> This patch cures this problem by ordering the reader-state vs
> reader-count (see the comments in __percpu_down_read() and
> percpu_down_write()). This changes a global atomic op into a full
> memory barrier, which doesn't have the global cacheline contention.
> 
> This also enables using the percpu-rwsem with rcu_sync disabled in order
> to bias the implementation differently, reducing the writer latency by
> adding some cost to readers.
> 
> Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h  |   84 +++++++++++++--
>  kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c |  228 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
> @@ -10,30 +10,96 @@
>  
>  struct percpu_rw_semaphore {
>  	struct rcu_sync		rss;
> -	unsigned int __percpu	*fast_read_ctr;
> +	unsigned int __percpu	*read_count;
>  	struct rw_semaphore	rw_sem;
> -	atomic_t		slow_read_ctr;
> -	wait_queue_head_t	write_waitq;
> +	wait_queue_head_t	writer;
> +	int			readers_block;
>  };
>  
> -extern void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
> -extern int  percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
> -extern void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
> +extern int __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *, int);
> +extern void __percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
> +
> +static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
> +{
> +	might_sleep();
> +
> +	rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	/*
> +	 * We are in an RCU-sched read-side critical section, so the writer
> +	 * cannot both change sem->state from readers_fast and start checking
> +	 * counters while we are here. So if we see !sem->state, we know that
> +	 * the writer won't be checking until we're past the preempt_enable()
> +	 * and that one the synchronize_sched() is done, the writer will see
> +	 * anything we did within this RCU-sched read-size critical section.
> +	 */
> +	__this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
> +	if (unlikely(!rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss)))

The call to rcu_sync_is_idle() causes the following build error when building
x86_64:allmodconfig.

ERROR: "rcu_sync_lockdep_assert" [kernel/locking/locktorture.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "rcu_sync_lockdep_assert" [fs/ext4/ext4.ko] undefined!

I think this was also reported by the 0-day build bot.

The simple fix would of course be to export rcu_sync_lockdep_assert. Before I
apply that change to the Android code (where the patch has been aplied and
the problem is seen) - do you by any chance have a better solution in mind ?

Thanks,
Guenter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-31  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-09  9:51 [PATCH v2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-09 23:47 ` John Stultz
2016-08-10  7:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-10 17:09     ` Oleg Nesterov
     [not found]       ` <CAH7ZN-zXrenrbbcmvZ+biNozYe21jw6fULopG=g9-xRwWHE6nw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <5a2cc178ee03466fa3b104f8f28b44ff@NASANEXM02C.na.qualcomm.com>
2016-08-13  1:44           ` Om Dhyade
2016-08-24 21:16             ` John Stultz
2016-08-24 21:30               ` Tejun Heo
2016-08-24 22:50                 ` John Stultz
2016-08-26  2:14                 ` John Stultz
2016-08-26 12:51                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-08-26 16:47                     ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-08-26 20:10                       ` Om Dhyade
2016-08-11 16:54 ` [PATCH] cgroup: avoid synchronize_sched() in __cgroup_procs_write() Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-18 10:59   ` [tip:locking/core] locking, rcu, cgroup: Avoid " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-18 13:41   ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31  5:21 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-08-31  8:09   ` [v2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31 13:41     ` Guenter Roeck
2016-08-31 13:47       ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160831052102.GA14571@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=ccross@google.com \
    --cc=dimitrysh@google.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=romlem@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox