From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933544AbcHaLlj (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:41:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:35810 "EHLO mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932520AbcHaLli (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:41:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:43:23 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: LKML , Thor Thayer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular Message-ID: <20160831114323.GA8649@dell> References: <20160705012544.14143-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20160705012544.14143-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20160805125706.GA5243@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Jul 2016, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > >> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: > >> > >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_ALTERA_A10SR > >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig: bool "Altera Arria10 DevKit System Resource chip" > >> > >> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. > >> > >> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that > >> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. > >> > > [...] > > >> > >> Cc: Thor Thayer > >> Cc: Lee Jones > >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/altera-a10sr.c | 14 ++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Applied, thanks. > > Hi Lee, > > I never did see this applied copy of the patch loop around via linux-next > and conflict with my local copy of the same patch. Same for 3,4,5,6 of > the same series (patch #2 was not applied; it was dropped in favour of > a redo as a tristate conversion.) > > Just wanting to double check I didn't mess something up that caused them > to get silently dropped after the fact, before I prepare to send any additional > mfd patches to be considered for your 4.9 content queue. It's been dropped. Make your subsequent changes. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog