From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934933AbcHaN5A (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:57:00 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com ([209.85.161.196]:33472 "EHLO mail-yw0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934625AbcHaN44 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:56:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:56:52 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Parav Pandit Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, dledford@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, liranl@mellanox.com, sean.hefty@intel.com, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, haggaie@mellanox.com, corbet@lwn.net, james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, matanb@mellanox.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 0/3] rdmacg: IB/core: rdma controller support Message-ID: <20160831135652.GD12660@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1472632647-1525-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1472632647-1525-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:07:24PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > rdmacg: IB/core: rdma controller support > > Patch is generated and tested against below Doug's linux-rdma > git tree. > > URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma.git > Branch: master > > Patchset is also compiled and tested against below Tejun's cgroup tree > using cgroup v2 mode. > URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git > Branch: master > > Overview: > Currently user space applications can easily take away all the rdma > device specific resources such as AH, CQ, QP, MR etc. Due to which other > applications in other cgroup or kernel space ULPs may not even get chance > to allocate any rdma resources. This results into service unavailibility. Generally looks good to me. Please feel free to add Acked-by: Tejun Heo for the whole series. Also, once reviews from rdma side are done, please let me know what's the preferable way to route the patchset. I can route it through the cgroup tree or it can go through rdma one. Thanks a lot for the persisence! -- tejun