From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933514AbcIAPcI (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:32:08 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52921 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932901AbcIAPcH (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:32:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 17:32:15 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: David Daney , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, David Daney , Laura Garcia Liebana , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aaro Koskinen , Bhaktipriya Shridhar , Cristina Moraru , Philippe Reynes Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] staging: octeon: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module Message-ID: <20160901153215.GA24505@kroah.com> References: <1472133315-14640-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <57BF1644.5060207@caviumnetworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 06:56:07PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello David, > > On 08/25/2016 12:01 PM, David Daney wrote: > > On 08/25/2016 06:55 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> The IS_ENABLED() macro checks if a Kconfig symbol has been enabled either > >> built-in or as a module, use that macro instead of open coding the same. > >> > >> Using the macro makes the code more readable by helping abstract away some > >> of the Kconfig built-in and module enable details. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > >> Acked-by: David Daney > >> > >> --- > >> > >> Changes since first post: > >> - Added David Daney Acked-by tag. > >> - Rebased on top of latest master. > >> > > > > You changed something about the patch. In this case the Subject is not "RESEND", but rather "v2". Incorrect Subject lines like this can lead to the patch being inadvertently ignored. > > > > Yes, in fact I thought about adding a v2 suffix instead of RESEND but since > I didn't change the patch content (besides merge conflicts resolution), I > preferred to add the latter. > > I can re-spin the patch if that's an issue. Please do. thanks, greg k-h