From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755445AbcIFRTV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:19:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:37971 "EHLO mail-wm0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940AbcIFRTU (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:19:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:19:15 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net, eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] perf, bts: Fallout from the fuzzer for perf/urgent Message-ID: <20160906171915.GA8963@gmail.com> References: <20160906132353.19887-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160906132353.19887-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Hi, > > There were more bugs since the previous version, plus the BTS barriers got > fixed. With these patches, my testcase keeps running and no spurious NMI > warnings pop up any more. Could you please also run the fuzzer that Vince uses, does it now pass on hardware you have access to? I'd like to make "passes the fuzzer" a standard requirement before new changes are accepted to perf core. Thanks, Ingo