From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757128AbcIHDGI (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:06:08 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:54874 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751688AbcIHDF7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:05:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:01:40 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Kent Overstreet Cc: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" , Harald Dunkel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bcache vs bcachefs Message-ID: <20160908030140.ytuauwd34edctrpp@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Kent Overstreet , "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" , Harald Dunkel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <87wpip9x8r.fsf@sylvester.afaics.de> <20160907005546.dw7hxczrbbmnkplc@kmo-pixel> <5a97b9e7-4928-3d3f-a841-2f9198d8f45d@gmail.com> <20160907155552.4fqndafa7vepattr@kmo-pixel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160907155552.4fqndafa7vepattr@kmo-pixel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:55:52AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > That said, I'm not advocating people rush out to throw bcachefs on their servers > or use it without backups yet, it's still young and needs more widespread > testing. Hi Kent! Have you started using xfstests to stress test bcachefs yet? You may be interested in reading through this presentation, especially the last slide. :-) https://thunk.org/gce-xfstests - Ted