From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1757366AbcIHG4M (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 8 Sep 2016 02:56:12 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:33883 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753191AbcIHG4K (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Sep 2016 02:56:10 -0400
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:56:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, serebrin@google.com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier
Message-ID: <20160908065606.GB25876@gmail.com>
References: <20160825150515.02c2d8ea@riellap.home.surriel.com>
 <7E7CF02F-F0B1-493A-98B3-B078174811DA@zytor.com>
 <20160825170133.0a783ae8@riellap.home.surriel.com>
 <20160827080316.GA11325@gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFxfaBNRP_H__JjdEr75r2oWpah=vu7560a_aXn=Ay6r0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160831122710.5285c4ca@annuminas.surriel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160831122710.5285c4ca@annuminas.surriel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:02:25 -0700
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, with those small fixes from Ingo, I definitely don't think this
> > looks hacky at all. This all seems to be exactly what we should always
> > have done.
> 
> OK, so I was too tired yesterday to do kernel hacking, and
> missed yet another bit (xen_flush_tlb_others). Sigh.
> 
> Otherwise, the patch is identical.
> 
> Looking forward to Ben's test results.

Gentle ping to Ben.

I can also apply this without waiting for the test result, the patch looks sane 
enough to me.

Thanks,

	Ingo