From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934529AbcIHHEJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 8 Sep 2016 03:04:09 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:36014 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932640AbcIHHEH (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Sep 2016 03:04:07 -0400
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:04:01 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86/dumpstack: allow preemption in
 show_stack_log_lvl() and dump_trace()
Message-ID: <20160908070401.GA3189@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1472057064.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
 <6136e151d742a1589edcb7b44cf52cd6dcb4b006.1472057064.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6136e151d742a1589edcb7b44cf52cd6dcb4b006.1472057064.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:

>  arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 14 ++++++--------

> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c

> +static void *is_softirq_stack(unsigned long *stack);
>  {

FYI, this bit clearly wasn't build tested on 32-bit even once - I'm skipping this 
patch.

Thanks,

	Ingo