From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel 4.8-rc5 kernel BUG at block/blk-core.c:2032!
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:33:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908173328.GA58334@shli-mbp.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ad7efe2-ef46-e1d5-bb0d-c7ed0e8d47db@kernel.dk>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:16:59AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 02:23 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while trying Kernel 4.8-rc5 my raid5 breaks every few minutes.
> >
> > Trace:
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > kernel BUG at block/blk-core.c:2032!
> > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > Modules linked in: netconsole ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_multiport
> > iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables 8021q garp bonding sb_edac edac_core
> > x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp kvm_intel kvm i2c_i801 irqbypass i2c_smbus
> > ipmi_si crc32_pclmul i2c_core ghash_clmulni_intel shpchp ipmi_msghandler
> > button loop fuse btrfs dm_mod raid10 raid0 multipath linear raid456
> > async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq
> > raid1 md_mod sg sd_mod ixgbe i40e mdio usbhid ehci_pci ehci_hcd ahci
> > usbcore ptp libahci usb_common megaraid_sas pps_core
> > CPU: 8 PID: 1105 Comm: md0_raid5 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc5-00003-g3abda5c #2
> > Hardware name: Supermicro X10DRH/X10DRH-iT, BIOS 1.0c 02/18/2015
> > task: ffff97de5e1e0000 task.stack: ffff97de597a0000
> > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffbc3b3890>] [<ffffffffbc3b3890>]
> > generic_make_request+0x1c0/0x1d0
> > RSP: 0018:ffff97de597a3aa0 EFLAGS: 00010286
> > RAX: ffff97de5e1e0000 RBX: ffff97dd227e5030 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > RDX: ffffffffc0000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff97de5e7d9db8
> > RBP: ffff97de597a3ad8 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000ffffffff
> > R13: ffff97de5aa20c00 R14: 00000000000002f0 R15: ffff97e65dce0e00
> > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff97e67f200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 00007f0e4e1ec000 CR3: 0000000078c06000 CR4: 00000000001406e0Stack:
> > ffff97de597a3b50 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 ffff97dd227e4c80
> > ffff97de5aa20c00 00000000000002f0 ffff97e65dce0e00 ffff97de597a3ba0
> > ffffffffc02595db ffffffffc025e04b 00000001597a3b01 0000000200000006
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffffc02595db>] ops_run_io+0x3bb/0x990 [raid456]
> > [<ffffffffc025e04b>] ? raid_run_ops+0xefb/0x1520 [raid456]
> > [<ffffffffc0261d16>] handle_stripe+0x9a6/0x2280 [raid456]
> > [<ffffffffbc0ae6b2>] ? default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
> > [<ffffffffbc0c7d22>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x12/0x40
> > [<ffffffffc0263783>] handle_active_stripes.isra.54+0x193/0x4b0 [raid456]
> > [<ffffffffc02571d5>] ? __release_stripe+0x15/0x20 [raid456]
> > [<ffffffffc0263f49>] raid5d+0x4a9/0x740 [raid456]
> > [<ffffffffbc0e88f0>] ? init_timer_key+0xa0/0xa0
> > [<ffffffffc019a7eb>] md_thread+0x12b/0x130 [md_mod]
> > [<ffffffffbc0c7d10>] ? wait_woken+0x90/0x90
> > [<ffffffffc019a6c0>] ? find_pers+0x70/0x70 [md_mod]
> > [<ffffffffbc0a395b>] kthread+0xdb/0x100
> > [<ffffffffbc6de57f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> > [<ffffffffbc0a3880>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
> > Code: bd 70 08 00 00 f0 49 83 ad 70 08 00 00 01 74 05 e9 5a ff ff ff 41
> > ff 95 80 08 00 00 e9 4e ff ff ff 48 c7 40 08 00 00 00 00 eb 8c <0f> 0b
> > 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00
> > RIP [<ffffffffbc3b3890>] generic_make_request+0x1c0/0x1d0
> > RSP <ffff97de597a3aa0>
> > ---[ end trace 457dbe5e9cdd3473 ]---
>
> CC'ing Shaohua - this is:
>
> BUG_ON(bio->bi_next);
>
> which doesn't look healthy.
Hi Stefan,
does below patch help? Looks there is a race condition introduced recently.
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index b95c54c..ee7fc37 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2423,10 +2423,10 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi)
}
}
rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
+ bio_reset(bi);
clear_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
raid5_release_stripe(sh);
- bio_reset(bi);
}
static void raid5_end_write_request(struct bio *bi)
@@ -2498,6 +2498,7 @@ static void raid5_end_write_request(struct bio *bi)
if (sh->batch_head && bi->bi_error && !replacement)
set_bit(STRIPE_BATCH_ERR, &sh->batch_head->state);
+ bio_reset(bi);
if (!test_and_clear_bit(R5_DOUBLE_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags))
clear_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
@@ -2505,7 +2506,6 @@ static void raid5_end_write_request(struct bio *bi)
if (sh->batch_head && sh != sh->batch_head)
raid5_release_stripe(sh->batch_head);
- bio_reset(bi);
}
static void raid5_build_block(struct stripe_head *sh, int i, int previous)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-08 8:23 kernel 4.8-rc5 kernel BUG at block/blk-core.c:2032! Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2016-09-08 16:16 ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-08 17:33 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2016-09-09 18:03 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2016-09-09 18:15 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160908173328.GA58334@shli-mbp.local \
--to=shli@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox