From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1759269AbcIHSRE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:17:04 -0400
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:35662 "EHLO
        merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753840AbcIHSRD (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:17:03 -0400
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:16:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFCv4 0/7]  arm_pmu/perf tools: play nicely with CPU PMU
 cpumasks
Message-ID: <20160908181657.GX10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1473330112-28528-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <20160908162502.GB4801@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160908162502.GB4801@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 01:25:02PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:21:45AM +0100, Mark Rutland escreveu:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm trying to make the perf tool play better with PMUs in heterogeneous systems
> > (e.g. big.LITTLE), where there are several logical PMUs, each covering a subset
> > of CPUs.
> 
> So I added 6/7 and 7/7 to my local perf/core branch, I think they can go
> before the others, Peter, do you want me to take the kernel parts as
> well?

arm pmu stuff usually goes through the arm tree. Up to Mark I suppose.