From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753835AbcIIJbf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 05:31:35 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:36880 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752325AbcIIJbc (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 05:31:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:31:31 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFCv4 0/7] arm_pmu/perf tools: play nicely with CPU PMU cpumasks Message-ID: <20160909093131.GC20192@arm.com> References: <1473330112-28528-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20160908162502.GB4801@kernel.org> <20160908181657.GX10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160908181657.GX10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:16:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 01:25:02PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:21:45AM +0100, Mark Rutland escreveu: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm trying to make the perf tool play better with PMUs in heterogeneous systems > > > (e.g. big.LITTLE), where there are several logical PMUs, each covering a subset > > > of CPUs. > > > > So I added 6/7 and 7/7 to my local perf/core branch, I think they can go > > before the others, Peter, do you want me to take the kernel parts as > > well? > > arm pmu stuff usually goes through the arm tree. Up to Mark I suppose. I can queue the kernel bits once I've reviewed them (will try to take a look today). Will