From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756645AbcILDft (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:35:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f194.google.com ([209.85.192.194]:34350 "EHLO mail-pf0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756080AbcILDfq (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:35:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:35:36 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin To: Dan Williams Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Xiao Guangrong , Arnd Bergmann , linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, mincore2(): retrieve dax and tlb-size attributes of an address range Message-ID: <20160912133536.1bdb57a9@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <147361509579.17004.5258725187329709824.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <147361509579.17004.5258725187329709824.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 10:31:35 -0700 Dan Williams wrote: > As evidenced by this bug report [1], userspace libraries are interested > in whether a mapping is DAX mapped, i.e. no intervening page cache. > Rather than using the ambiguous VM_MIXEDMAP flag in smaps, provide an > explicit "is dax" indication as a new flag in the page vector populated > by mincore. Can you cc linux-arch when adding new syscalls (or other such things that need arch enablement). I wonder if the changelog for a new syscall should have a bit more grandeur. Without seeing patch 2, you might not know this was a new syscall just by reading the subject and changelog. mincore() defines other bits to be reserved, but I guess it probably breaks things if you suddenly started using them. It's a bit sad to introduce a new syscall for this and immediately use up all bits that can be returned. Would it be a serious problem to return a larger mask per page? Thanks, Nick