From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932675AbcILRHu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:07:50 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57840 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932618AbcILRHo (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:07:44 -0400
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:07:27 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org>
Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ARM, SoC: About the use DT-defined properties by 3rd-party
 drivers
Message-ID: <20160912170727.GH14165@leverpostej>
References: <57BDAF2E.10502@laposte.net>
 <CAOZdJXVjsR3NTWiJX33yT3jYk=FU65raWoMooTLD7OMN3sqP-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <57D69FB1.2020801@laposte.net>
 <20160912123809.GB13741@leverpostej>
 <57D6AA54.6000208@laposte.net>
 <20160912135549.GA14165@leverpostej>
 <CANCZdfri+T59FA4XTaH5JbW0BaJHt3w5eaSkpD8NrJn6nZrZbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <57D6D7D2.7030507@laposte.net>
 <CANCZdfqZEMRaFqgph6kZPdyxBcURBiEV0XoH0vPG28Hhm5+77A@mail.gmail.com>
 <57D6DC83.8020000@tabi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57D6DC83.8020000@tabi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:49:07AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Warner Losh wrote:
> >Do I have more examples
> >where FreeBSD has to deviate because the DT is actually Linux
> >specific and does a poor job of modeling the hardware and instead
> >reflects the Linux driver model? I have plenty of those...
> 
> I think it would be a great idea if the FreeBSD and Linux DT
> maintainers collaborated on cleaning up the DT bindings so that this
> problem no longer occurs (or at least, not normally).

Indeed. Theoretically/hopefully, the devicetree.org stuff creates a more
inclusive forum for this.

Thanks,
Mark.