From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] perf report: Enable group view with hierarchy
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:06:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160913010619.GE3641@sejong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160912142844.GF4897@kernel.org>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:28:44AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:19:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Now all missing pieces are implemented, let's enable it. An example
> > output below:
>
> So. what are those events? What was the command line that produced the
> 'perf.data' file that was used?
Oh, the command line was:
$ perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}' make
I'll add it to the changelog.
Thanks,
Namhyung
p.s. Actually the most overhead goes to the compiler (cc1) in this
data. But I omitted it since it has so many unresolved symbol
addresses. I think it's not a problem to demonstrate the hierarchy +
group feature.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > $ perf report --hierarchy --stdio
> > ...
> > # Overhead Command / Shared Object / Symbol
> > # ...................... ..................................
> > #
> > 25.74% 27.18% sh
> > 19.96% 24.14% libc-2.24.so
> > 9.55% 14.64% [.] __strcmp_sse2
> > 1.54% 0.00% [.] __tfind
> > 1.07% 1.13% [.] _int_malloc
> > 0.95% 0.00% [.] __strchr_sse2
> > 0.89% 1.39% [.] __tsearch
> > 0.76% 0.00% [.] strlen
> > ...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > index 1a07c4cdf6ed..6e88460cd13d 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > @@ -935,7 +935,6 @@ int cmd_report(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> >
> > if (symbol_conf.report_hierarchy) {
> > /* disable incompatible options */
> > - symbol_conf.event_group = false;
> > symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain = false;
> >
> > if (field_order) {
> > --
> > 2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-13 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-12 6:19 [PATCHSET 0/7] perf tools: Support hierarchy report with event group (v1) Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 6:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf hists browser: Fix event group display Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 14:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-20 21:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 6:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf hist: Introduce hists__match_hierarchy() Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 14:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-12 23:59 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 6:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf hist: Introduce hists__link_hierarchy() Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 6:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf hist: Initialize hierachy tree explicitly Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 14:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-13 0:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 6:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf ui/stdio: Reset output width for hierarchy Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 14:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-13 1:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 6:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf ui/tui: " Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 14:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-13 1:01 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 6:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf report: Enable group view with hierarchy Namhyung Kim
2016-09-12 14:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-13 1:06 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-13 7:45 [PATCHSET 0/7] perf tools: Support hierarchy report with event group (v2) Namhyung Kim
2016-09-13 7:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf report: Enable group view with hierarchy Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160913010619.GE3641@sejong \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).