From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] dm: Remove dm_bufio_cond_resched()
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:39:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160913133959.GA22833@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160913084520.GA5012@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Sep 13 2016 at 4:45am -0400,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While grepping for PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY I ran into dm_bufio_cond_resched()
> and wondered WTH it was about.
>
> Is there anything wrong with the below patch?
No, I'll pick it up for 4.9 merge. Mikulas added it for sparc or
something. I cannot recall _the_ reason (I wasn't maintaining DM back
then) but at the time both Alasdair and Joe Thornber reasoned that it
needed to go -- and that if it was really needed that it should be done
in terms of a proper patch to sched.h, etc.
So I'm not sure how this dm-bufio local cond_resched() wrapper still got
in... happy to take your patch.
Please respond with whatever SOB you'd like applied to the patch header.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-13 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-13 8:45 [RFC][PATCH] dm: Remove dm_bufio_cond_resched() Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-13 12:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-13 13:39 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2016-09-19 10:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-22 20:53 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-09-22 20:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-23 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-23 8:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-23 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-23 9:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-23 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-09-23 12:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-09-23 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-23 12:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-09-23 12:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-23 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-23 14:32 ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2016-09-19 9:49 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-09-19 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160913133959.GA22833@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox