From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@android.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] android: binder: Disable preemption while holding the global binder lock
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:13:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160914161340.GE5020@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160914161103.GC5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:11:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:53:27PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > cgroups should be irrelevant, PI is unaware of them.
> >
> > I don't think cgroups are irrelevant. PI being unaware of them
> > explains the problem I described. If the task that holds the lock is
> > in a cgroup that has a low cpu.shares value, then boosting the task's
> > priority within that group does necessarily make it any more likely to
> > run.
>
> Thing is, for FIFO/DL the important parameters (prio and deadline resp.)
> are not cgroup dependent.
>
> For CFS you're right, and as per usual, cgroups will be a royal pain.
> While we can compute the total weight in the block chain, getting that
> back to a task which is stuck in a cgroup is just not going to work
> well.
Not to mention the fact that the weight depends on the current running
state. Having those tasks block insta changes the actual weight.
> /me curses @ cgroups.. bloody stupid things.
More of that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-08 16:12 [PATCH] android: binder: Disable preemption while holding the global binder lock Todd Kjos
2016-09-08 16:15 ` Todd Kjos
2016-09-08 17:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-09-10 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-10 16:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-10 16:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-10 17:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-09-12 15:49 ` Todd Kjos
2016-09-13 3:44 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2016-09-13 6:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-09-13 19:52 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2016-09-13 7:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-13 19:53 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2016-09-14 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-14 7:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-14 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-14 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-14 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-09-14 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-17 0:42 ` Todd Kjos
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-09 15:17 Todd Kjos
2016-09-09 15:44 ` Greg KH
2016-09-09 17:39 ` Todd Kjos
2016-09-10 11:18 ` Greg KH
2016-09-10 11:25 ` Greg KH
2016-09-09 16:37 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160914161340.GE5020@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riandrews@android.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox