From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753107AbcIOQSg (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:18:36 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:40846 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751798AbcIOQS3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:18:29 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:18:29 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Cc: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Dave Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kprobe: Always clear pstate.D in breakpoint
 exception handler
Message-ID: <20160915161828.GH3380@arm.com>
References: <1059f6762466c2cebf32aa40e4d7974731a68726.1471848065.git.panand@redhat.com>
 <20160823000531.b12ac14c18ce8e9d3abc74ec@kernel.org>
 <CAAOGbpwcx3G8Jdf1AfNRLrkZJQLaCcLWQPRppjvpy3=hSrffjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160824100644.GB4408@localhost.localdomain>
 <CAHB_Guods-iED+tOLeJ9XCWDvAVoButwz2XWSiP+eMYDzFhfyQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHB_Guods-iED+tOLeJ9XCWDvAVoButwz2XWSiP+eMYDzFhfyQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:45:09PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 23/08/2016:04:33:08 PM, Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
> >> Thanks for the fix, feel free to add my ACK as well. Has it been tested on
> >> guest kernel?
> >
> > have not tested on guest kernel.Will do.
> 
> I tested it with guest kernel, and it worked there too :-).
> 
> @Catalin: any more comment for this patch? If not, then may be you can take it.

I already queued this on the arm64 for-next/core branch.

Will