From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757955AbcIPKEX (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 06:04:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55476 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752123AbcIPKEP (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 06:04:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:10:16 +0200 From: Alexander Gordeev To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/21] blk-mq: Introduce combined hardware queues Message-ID: <20160916101015.GD2476@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> References: <20160916092743.GA5079@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160916092743.GA5079@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:27:43AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Alex, > > this clashes badly with the my queue mapping rework that went into > Jens tree recently. Yeah, I fully aware the RFC-marked patches would clash with your works. I will surely rework them if the proposal considered worthwhile. > But in the meantime: there seem to be lots of little bugfixes and > cleanups in the series, any chance you could send them out as a first > series while updating the rest? [He-he :) I can even see you removed map_queue() as well] I will rebase the cleanups on top of your tree. > Also please Cc the linux-block list for block layer patches that don't > even seem to touch the nvme driver. Just wanted let NVMe people know, as this h/w is presumably main beneficiary. Thanks!