From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758427AbcIQMUe (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:20:34 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:36816 "EHLO mail-lf0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753234AbcIQMU0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:20:26 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:20:21 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Joe Perches , Linus Torvalds , Sam Varshavchik , Ingo Molnar , Laura Abbott , Brent , Andrew Morton , Christian Borntraeger , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] RLIMIT_DATA crashes named Message-ID: <20160917122021.GC26044@uranus.lan> References: <1474085296.32273.95.camel@perches.com> <20160917090941.GB26044@uranus.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 03:09:09PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > > > > Seems I don't understand the bottom unlikely... > > This is gcc extrension: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Exprs.html > Here macro works as a function which returns bool no, no, I know for what unlikely extension stand for. it was just hard to obtain from without the context. this extension implies someone calls for if (printk_periodic()) right?