From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqtime: Remove needless IRQs disablement on kcpustat update
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:54:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160918155425.GP5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160918134742.GB5909@lerouge>
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> I love that! I've seen so many cases where I wanted this runtime check without
> the overhead of it on production kernels.
>
> I can take that patch, now since this is lockdep code and my series is scheduler's
> code that depend on it, how can we manage the dependency between the two branches?
>
> Perhaps I can add the lockdep patch in the series, there will likely be no
> wicked conflicts agains potential changes in the lockdep tree.
Yeah, just take it along with the rest of the patches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-18 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-02 14:03 [PATCH 0/5] sched/cputime: irqtime cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-02 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] irqtime: No need for preempt-safe accessors Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-06 16:59 ` Rik van Riel
2016-09-02 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] irqtime: Remove needless IRQs disablement on kcpustat update Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-02 14:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-02 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-06 17:00 ` Rik van Riel
2016-09-07 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-18 13:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-18 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-09-02 14:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] u64_stats: Introduce IRQs disabled helpers Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-02 14:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-18 13:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-02 14:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Consolidate accounting synchronization with u64_stats API Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-06 17:03 ` Rik van Riel
2016-09-02 14:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] irqtime: Consolidate irqtime flushing code Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-06 16:52 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-26 0:29 [PATCH 0/5] sched/cputime: irqtime cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2016-09-26 0:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] irqtime: Remove needless IRQs disablement on kcpustat update Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160918155425.GP5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox