From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754913AbcIRPyg (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:54:36 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:46959 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754071AbcIRPyc (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:54:32 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:54:25 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Paolo Bonzini , Wanpeng Li , Eric Dumazet , Ingo Molnar , Mike Galbraith , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqtime: Remove needless IRQs disablement on kcpustat update Message-ID: <20160918155425.GP5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1472824985-22947-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1472824985-22947-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20160907075913.GR10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160918134742.GB5909@lerouge> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160918134742.GB5909@lerouge> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > I love that! I've seen so many cases where I wanted this runtime check without > the overhead of it on production kernels. > > I can take that patch, now since this is lockdep code and my series is scheduler's > code that depend on it, how can we manage the dependency between the two branches? > > Perhaps I can add the lockdep patch in the series, there will likely be no > wicked conflicts agains potential changes in the lockdep tree. Yeah, just take it along with the rest of the patches.