From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754523AbcITJma (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 05:42:30 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:36702 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752145AbcITJm1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 05:42:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:42:23 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron , Jonathan Corbet , Christoffer Dall , Vladimir Murzin , Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] jump_labels: Add API to deal with keys embedded in structures Message-ID: <20160920094223.GR5012@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1474305688-22553-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1474305688-22553-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1474305688-22553-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 06:21:27PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > It is desirable to allow static keys to be integrated in structures, > as it can lead do slightly more readable code. But the current API > only provides DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE/FALSE, which is not exactly > nice and leads to the following idiom: > > static struct { > int foo; > struct static_key_false key; > } bar = { > .key = STATIC_KEY_FALSE_INIT, > }; > > [...] > > if (static_branch_unlikely(&bar.key)) > foo = -1; > > which doesn't follow the recommended API, and uses the internals > of the static key implementation. > > This patch introduces DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE/FALSE, as well as > INIT_STATIC_KEY_TRUE/FALSE, which abstract such construct and > allow the internals to evolve without having to fix everything else: > > static struct { > int foo; > DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(key); > } bar = { > INIT_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(.key), > }; Hurm.. I think I like the first better, it looks more like actual C. Either way around you need to now manually match up the type and initializer.