* [PATCH 0/2] fix bad constant expressions in tpm.h @ 2016-09-19 20:22 Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-19 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-19 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-19 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Huewe Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen, Jason Gunthorpe, open list, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER Even though the cpu_to_be32() is open coded it is not a good convention to call it in the enum definitions. This will also sparse errors about invalid constant expressions. Ed Swierk (1): tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities Jarkko Sakkinen (1): tpm: fix bad constant expressions drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 78 +++++++++++++--------------------------- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 4 +-- drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 23 ++++++------ 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities 2016-09-19 20:22 [PATCH 0/2] fix bad constant expressions in tpm.h Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-19 20:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-19 23:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2016-09-19 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions Jarkko Sakkinen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-19 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Huewe Cc: Ed Swierk, Jarkko Sakkinen, Marcel Selhorst, Jason Gunthorpe, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> Call tpm_getcap() from tpm_get_timeouts() to eliminate redundant code. Return all errors to the caller rather than swallowing them (e.g. when tpm_transmit_cmd() returns nonzero). Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 65 +++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c index 8de6187..ca6162e 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c @@ -488,10 +488,9 @@ static int tpm_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip, __be16 startup_type) int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) { - struct tpm_cmd_t tpm_cmd; + cap_t cap; unsigned long new_timeout[4]; unsigned long old_timeout[4]; - struct duration_t *duration_cap; ssize_t rc; if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) { @@ -509,43 +508,25 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) return 0; } - tpm_cmd.header.in = tpm_getcap_header; - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = TPM_CAP_PROP; - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size = cpu_to_be32(4); - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap = TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT; - rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &tpm_cmd, TPM_INTERNAL_RESULT_SIZE, 0, - NULL); - + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT, &cap, + "attempting to determine the timeouts"); if (rc == TPM_ERR_INVALID_POSTINIT) { /* The TPM is not started, we are the first to talk to it. Execute a startup command. */ - dev_info(&chip->dev, "Issuing TPM_STARTUP"); + dev_info(&chip->dev, "Issuing TPM_STARTUP\n"); if (tpm_startup(chip, TPM_ST_CLEAR)) return rc; - tpm_cmd.header.in = tpm_getcap_header; - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = TPM_CAP_PROP; - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size = cpu_to_be32(4); - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap = TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT; - rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &tpm_cmd, TPM_INTERNAL_RESULT_SIZE, - 0, NULL); + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT, &cap, + "attempting to determine the timeouts"); } - if (rc) { - dev_err(&chip->dev, - "A TPM error (%zd) occurred attempting to determine the timeouts\n", - rc); - goto duration; - } - - if (be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.return_code) != 0 || - be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.length) - != sizeof(tpm_cmd.header.out) + sizeof(u32) + 4 * sizeof(u32)) - return -EINVAL; + if (rc) + return rc; - old_timeout[0] = be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.params.getcap_out.cap.timeout.a); - old_timeout[1] = be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.params.getcap_out.cap.timeout.b); - old_timeout[2] = be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.params.getcap_out.cap.timeout.c); - old_timeout[3] = be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.params.getcap_out.cap.timeout.d); + old_timeout[0] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.a); + old_timeout[1] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.b); + old_timeout[2] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.c); + old_timeout[3] = be32_to_cpu(cap.timeout.d); memcpy(new_timeout, old_timeout, sizeof(new_timeout)); /* @@ -583,29 +564,17 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip) chip->timeout_c = usecs_to_jiffies(new_timeout[2]); chip->timeout_d = usecs_to_jiffies(new_timeout[3]); -duration: - tpm_cmd.header.in = tpm_getcap_header; - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = TPM_CAP_PROP; - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size = cpu_to_be32(4); - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap = TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION; - - rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &tpm_cmd, TPM_INTERNAL_RESULT_SIZE, 0, - "attempting to determine the durations"); + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION, &cap, + "attempting to determine the durations"); if (rc) return rc; - if (be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.return_code) != 0 || - be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.length) - != sizeof(tpm_cmd.header.out) + sizeof(u32) + 3 * sizeof(u32)) - return -EINVAL; - - duration_cap = &tpm_cmd.params.getcap_out.cap.duration; chip->duration[TPM_SHORT] = - usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu(duration_cap->tpm_short)); + usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu(cap.duration.tpm_short)); chip->duration[TPM_MEDIUM] = - usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu(duration_cap->tpm_medium)); + usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu(cap.duration.tpm_medium)); chip->duration[TPM_LONG] = - usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu(duration_cap->tpm_long)); + usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu(cap.duration.tpm_long)); /* The Broadcom BCM0102 chipset in a Dell Latitude D820 gets the above * value wrong and apparently reports msecs rather than usecs. So we -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities 2016-09-19 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-19 23:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2016-10-21 20:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2016-09-19 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Peter Huewe, Ed Swierk, Marcel Selhorst, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:22:08PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> > > Call tpm_getcap() from tpm_get_timeouts() to eliminate redundant > code. Return all errors to the caller rather than swallowing them > (e.g. when tpm_transmit_cmd() returns nonzero). I didn't look at these closely, but I agree with the idea. Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities 2016-09-19 23:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe @ 2016-10-21 20:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-21 20:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-10-21 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Peter Huewe, Ed Swierk, Marcel Selhorst, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:24:06PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:22:08PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> > > > > Call tpm_getcap() from tpm_get_timeouts() to eliminate redundant > > code. Return all errors to the caller rather than swallowing them > > (e.g. when tpm_transmit_cmd() returns nonzero). > > I didn't look at these closely, but I agree with the idea. Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities 2016-10-21 20:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-10-21 20:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-10-21 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Peter Huewe, Ed Swierk, Marcel Selhorst, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:33:44PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:24:06PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:22:08PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> > > > > > > Call tpm_getcap() from tpm_get_timeouts() to eliminate redundant > > > code. Return all errors to the caller rather than swallowing them > > > (e.g. when tpm_transmit_cmd() returns nonzero). > > > > I didn't look at these closely, but I agree with the idea. > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> I applied this. /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions 2016-09-19 20:22 [PATCH 0/2] fix bad constant expressions in tpm.h Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-19 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-19 20:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-20 7:08 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Winkler, Tomas 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-19 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Huewe Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen, Marcel Selhorst, Jason Gunthorpe, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list Sparse reports "bad constant expression" for the use of cpu_to_be32 inside enums tpm_capabilities and tpm_sub_capabilities. Even though it is probably expanded to a constant expression, it is probably cleaner not to use it there. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 4 ++-- drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 23 +++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c index ca6162e..db7359f 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c @@ -444,19 +444,22 @@ ssize_t tpm_getcap(struct tpm_chip *chip, __be32 subcap_id, cap_t *cap, int rc; tpm_cmd.header.in = tpm_getcap_header; - if (subcap_id == CAP_VERSION_1_1 || subcap_id == CAP_VERSION_1_2) { - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = subcap_id; + if (subcap_id == TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_1 || + subcap_id == TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_2) { + tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = cpu_to_be32(subcap_id); /*subcap field not necessary */ tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size = cpu_to_be32(0); tpm_cmd.header.in.length -= cpu_to_be32(sizeof(__be32)); } else { if (subcap_id == TPM_CAP_FLAG_PERM || subcap_id == TPM_CAP_FLAG_VOL) - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = TPM_CAP_FLAG; + tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = + cpu_to_be32(TPM_CAP_FLAG); else - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = TPM_CAP_PROP; + tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = + cpu_to_be32(TPM_CAP_PROP); tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size = cpu_to_be32(4); - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap = subcap_id; + tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap = cpu_to_be32(subcap_id); } rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &tpm_cmd, TPM_INTERNAL_RESULT_SIZE, 0, desc); diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c index a76ab4a..59a1ead 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static ssize_t caps_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, be32_to_cpu(cap.manufacturer_id)); /* Try to get a TPM version 1.2 TPM_CAP_VERSION_INFO */ - rc = tpm_getcap(chip, CAP_VERSION_1_2, &cap, + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_2, &cap, "attempting to determine the 1.2 version"); if (!rc) { str += sprintf(str, @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static ssize_t caps_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, cap.tpm_version_1_2.revMinor); } else { /* Otherwise just use TPM_STRUCT_VER */ - rc = tpm_getcap(chip, CAP_VERSION_1_1, &cap, + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_1, &cap, "attempting to determine the 1.1 version"); if (rc) return 0; diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h index 4d183c9..edc6f75 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h @@ -282,21 +282,20 @@ typedef union { } cap_t; enum tpm_capabilities { - TPM_CAP_FLAG = cpu_to_be32(4), - TPM_CAP_PROP = cpu_to_be32(5), - CAP_VERSION_1_1 = cpu_to_be32(0x06), - CAP_VERSION_1_2 = cpu_to_be32(0x1A) + TPM_CAP_FLAG = 4, + TPM_CAP_PROP = 5, + TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_1 = 0x06, + TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_2 = 0x1A, }; enum tpm_sub_capabilities { - TPM_CAP_PROP_PCR = cpu_to_be32(0x101), - TPM_CAP_PROP_MANUFACTURER = cpu_to_be32(0x103), - TPM_CAP_FLAG_PERM = cpu_to_be32(0x108), - TPM_CAP_FLAG_VOL = cpu_to_be32(0x109), - TPM_CAP_PROP_OWNER = cpu_to_be32(0x111), - TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT = cpu_to_be32(0x115), - TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION = cpu_to_be32(0x120), - + TPM_CAP_PROP_PCR = 0x101, + TPM_CAP_PROP_MANUFACTURER = 0x103, + TPM_CAP_FLAG_PERM = 0x108, + TPM_CAP_FLAG_VOL = 0x109, + TPM_CAP_PROP_OWNER = 0x111, + TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT = 0x115, + TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION = 0x120, }; struct tpm_getcap_params_in { -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions 2016-09-19 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-20 7:08 ` Winkler, Tomas 2016-09-20 9:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Winkler, Tomas @ 2016-09-20 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarkko Sakkinen, Peter Huewe; +Cc: moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list > -----Original Message----- > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 23:22 > To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> > Cc: moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER <tpmdd- > devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions > > Sparse reports "bad constant expression" for the use of cpu_to_be32 inside > enums tpm_capabilities and tpm_sub_capabilities. Even though it is probably > expanded to a constant expression, it is probably cleaner not to use it there. Swap macros were rewritten due to possible compiler bug https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/2/597 And the warning is actually a bug in sparse, it fails to detect constant expression now. Tomas > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 23 +++++++++++------------ > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm- > interface.c > index ca6162e..db7359f 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c > @@ -444,19 +444,22 @@ ssize_t tpm_getcap(struct tpm_chip *chip, __be32 > subcap_id, cap_t *cap, > int rc; > > tpm_cmd.header.in = tpm_getcap_header; > - if (subcap_id == CAP_VERSION_1_1 || subcap_id == > CAP_VERSION_1_2) { > - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = subcap_id; > + if (subcap_id == TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_1 || > + subcap_id == TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_2) { > + tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = cpu_to_be32(subcap_id); > /*subcap field not necessary */ > tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size = cpu_to_be32(0); > tpm_cmd.header.in.length -= cpu_to_be32(sizeof(__be32)); > } else { > if (subcap_id == TPM_CAP_FLAG_PERM || > subcap_id == TPM_CAP_FLAG_VOL) > - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = TPM_CAP_FLAG; > + tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = > + cpu_to_be32(TPM_CAP_FLAG); > else > - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = TPM_CAP_PROP; > + tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap = > + cpu_to_be32(TPM_CAP_PROP); > tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size = cpu_to_be32(4); > - tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap = subcap_id; > + tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap = > cpu_to_be32(subcap_id); > } > rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &tpm_cmd, > TPM_INTERNAL_RESULT_SIZE, 0, > desc); > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c > index a76ab4a..59a1ead 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c > @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static ssize_t caps_show(struct device *dev, struct > device_attribute *attr, > be32_to_cpu(cap.manufacturer_id)); > > /* Try to get a TPM version 1.2 TPM_CAP_VERSION_INFO */ > - rc = tpm_getcap(chip, CAP_VERSION_1_2, &cap, > + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_2, &cap, > "attempting to determine the 1.2 version"); > if (!rc) { > str += sprintf(str, > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static ssize_t caps_show(struct device *dev, struct > device_attribute *attr, > cap.tpm_version_1_2.revMinor); > } else { > /* Otherwise just use TPM_STRUCT_VER */ > - rc = tpm_getcap(chip, CAP_VERSION_1_1, &cap, > + rc = tpm_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_1, &cap, > "attempting to determine the 1.1 version"); > if (rc) > return 0; > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h index > 4d183c9..edc6f75 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > @@ -282,21 +282,20 @@ typedef union { > } cap_t; > > enum tpm_capabilities { > - TPM_CAP_FLAG = cpu_to_be32(4), > - TPM_CAP_PROP = cpu_to_be32(5), > - CAP_VERSION_1_1 = cpu_to_be32(0x06), > - CAP_VERSION_1_2 = cpu_to_be32(0x1A) > + TPM_CAP_FLAG = 4, > + TPM_CAP_PROP = 5, > + TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_1 = 0x06, > + TPM_CAP_VERSION_1_2 = 0x1A, > }; > > enum tpm_sub_capabilities { > - TPM_CAP_PROP_PCR = cpu_to_be32(0x101), > - TPM_CAP_PROP_MANUFACTURER = cpu_to_be32(0x103), > - TPM_CAP_FLAG_PERM = cpu_to_be32(0x108), > - TPM_CAP_FLAG_VOL = cpu_to_be32(0x109), > - TPM_CAP_PROP_OWNER = cpu_to_be32(0x111), > - TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT = cpu_to_be32(0x115), > - TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION = cpu_to_be32(0x120), > - > + TPM_CAP_PROP_PCR = 0x101, > + TPM_CAP_PROP_MANUFACTURER = 0x103, > + TPM_CAP_FLAG_PERM = 0x108, > + TPM_CAP_FLAG_VOL = 0x109, > + TPM_CAP_PROP_OWNER = 0x111, > + TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT = 0x115, > + TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_DURATION = 0x120, > }; > > struct tpm_getcap_params_in { > -- > 2.7.4 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > tpmdd-devel mailing list > tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions 2016-09-20 7:08 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Winkler, Tomas @ 2016-09-20 9:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-20 9:57 ` Winkler, Tomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-20 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Winkler, Tomas; +Cc: Peter Huewe, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:08:40AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 23:22 > > To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> > > Cc: moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER <tpmdd- > > devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > > Subject: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions > > > > Sparse reports "bad constant expression" for the use of cpu_to_be32 inside > > enums tpm_capabilities and tpm_sub_capabilities. Even though it is probably > > expanded to a constant expression, it is probably cleaner not to use it there. > > > Swap macros were rewritten due to possible compiler bug https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/2/597 > And the warning is actually a bug in sparse, it fails to detect constant expression now. I still think that these must be change in order to have some consistency in the subsystem. Now there are two differing conventions. /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions 2016-09-20 9:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-20 9:57 ` Winkler, Tomas 2016-09-20 12:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Winkler, Tomas @ 2016-09-20 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: Peter Huewe, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:08:40AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com] > > > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 23:22 > > > To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> > > > Cc: moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER <tpmdd- > > > devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; open list > > > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > > > Subject: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions > > > > > > Sparse reports "bad constant expression" for the use of cpu_to_be32 > > > inside enums tpm_capabilities and tpm_sub_capabilities. Even though > > > it is probably expanded to a constant expression, it is probably cleaner > not to use it there. > > > > > > Swap macros were rewritten due to possible compiler bug > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/2/597 > > And the warning is actually a bug in sparse, it fails to detect constant > expression now. > > I still think that these must be change in order to have some consistency in > the subsystem. Now there are two differing conventions. Nothing against the convention just the commit message is misleading in that sense. Tomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions 2016-09-20 9:57 ` Winkler, Tomas @ 2016-09-20 12:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-09-20 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Winkler, Tomas; +Cc: Peter Huewe, moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER, open list On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:57:48AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:08:40AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com] > > > > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 23:22 > > > > To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> > > > > Cc: moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER <tpmdd- > > > > devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; open list > > > > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > > > > Subject: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions > > > > > > > > Sparse reports "bad constant expression" for the use of cpu_to_be32 > > > > inside enums tpm_capabilities and tpm_sub_capabilities. Even though > > > > it is probably expanded to a constant expression, it is probably cleaner > > not to use it there. > > > > > > > > > Swap macros were rewritten due to possible compiler bug > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/2/597 > > > And the warning is actually a bug in sparse, it fails to detect constant > > expression now. > > > > I still think that these must be change in order to have some consistency in > > the subsystem. Now there are two differing conventions. > > Nothing against the convention just the commit message is misleading > in that sense. Tomas Right. I can edit it to say that "sanitize the constant declarations" or something like that. /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-21 20:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-09-19 20:22 [PATCH 0/2] fix bad constant expressions in tpm.h Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-19 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Clean up reading of timeout and duration capabilities Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-19 23:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2016-10-21 20:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-10-21 20:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-19 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm: fix bad constant expressions Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-20 7:08 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Winkler, Tomas 2016-09-20 9:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2016-09-20 9:57 ` Winkler, Tomas 2016-09-20 12:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox