From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754664AbcITXmb (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:42:31 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:57160 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752163AbcITXm3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:42:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 01:42:27 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Vivien Didelot Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: handle multiple ports in ATU Message-ID: <20160920234227.GA1730@lunn.ch> References: <20160919235611.31975-1-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20160920004129.GA8026@lunn.ch> <87wpi7idkr.fsf@ketchup.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wpi7idkr.fsf@ketchup.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:07:16PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Andrew Lunn writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:56:11PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > >> An address can be loaded in the ATU with multiple ports, for instance > >> when adding multiple ports to a Multicast group with "bridge mdb". > >> > >> The current code doesn't allow that. Add an helper to get a single entry > >> from the ATU, then set or clear the requested port, before loading the > >> entry back in the ATU. > >> > >> Note that the required _mv88e6xxx_atu_getnext function is defined below > >> mv88e6xxx_port_db_load_purge, so forward-declare it for the moment. The > >> ATU code will be isolated in future patches. > >> > >> Fixes: 83dabd1fa84c ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: make switchdev DB ops generic") > > > > Is this a real fixes? You don't make it clear what goes wrong. I > > assume adding the same MAC address for a second time but for a > > different port removes the first entry for the old port? > > Yes, this is what happens, sorry for the bad message. Below is an > example with the relevant hardware bits. > > Here's the current behavior, without this patch: > > # bridge mdb add dev br0 port lan0 grp 238.39.20.86 > > FID MAC Addr State Trunk? DPV/Trunk ID > 0 01:00:5e:27:14:56 MC_STATIC n 0 - - - - - - > > # bridge mdb add dev br0 port lan2 grp 238.39.20.86 > > FID MAC Addr State Trunk? DPV/Trunk ID > 0 01:00:5e:27:14:56 MC_STATIC n - - 2 - - - - > > Here's the new behavior, with this patch: > > # bridge mdb add dev br0 port lan0 grp 238.39.20.86 > > FID MAC Addr State Trunk? DPV/Trunk ID > 0 01:00:5e:27:14:56 MC_STATIC n 0 - - - - - - > > # bridge mdb add dev br0 port lan2 grp 238.39.20.86 > > FID MAC Addr State Trunk? DPV/Trunk ID > 0 01:00:5e:27:14:56 MC_STATIC n 0 - 2 - - - - Hi Vivien it would be nice to update the commit message with this text. Otherwise Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew