From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758231AbcIURbh (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:31:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:34664 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756591AbcIURbf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:31:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:31:29 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Sinan Kaya Cc: cov@codeaurora.org, Tomasz Nowicki , will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, jchandra@broadcom.com, dhdang@apm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, mw@semihalf.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, wangyijing@huawei.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, jcm@redhat.com, andrea.gallo@linaro.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com, liudongdong3@huawei.com, gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com, jhugo@codeaurora.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/5] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms Message-ID: <20160921173129.GA20006@localhost> References: <1473449047-10499-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <20160920192636.GB4941@localhost> <0429663d51ed8e93fb0c96261dd2ecc7@codeaurora.org> <20160921131107.GB10804@localhost> <25529f96-3e80-0524-82d8-6eeb517df5b5@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25529f96-3e80-0524-82d8-6eeb517df5b5@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:07:36AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 9/21/2016 9:11 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:15:14PM -0400, cov@codeaurora.org wrote: > >> Hi Bjorn, Thomasz, > >> > > >> > >> Did you delete this because there were no current users, because you'd > >> prefer users just use "-1", or for some other reason? > > > > I removed it because there were no users of it and, more importantly, > > the code doesn't implement support for it. > > Is it possible to queue up Cov's patch as part of this effort once he > rebases and sends an updated version? Cov will have to implement something > else now. I haven't see Cov's patch (patchwork doesn't follow URLs to git trees, and I normally don't either). If they show up on the mailing list, I'll take a look, of course. Bjorn