From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: add missing prototype
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:48:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160921184840.GD10850@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160920163259.5566-1-eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:32:59PM +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> `make W=1` warns:
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:226:15: warning: no previous prototype for ‘rcu_rnp_online_cpus’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> unsigned long rcu_rnp_online_cpus(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
You lost me on this one. It seems to be complaining about the initial
definition.
Hmmm... Would making this function static __maybe_unused also resolve this?
Thanx, Paul
> ---
>
> I couldn't figure out how this list is ordered, I'm happy to move this
> line if you want :)
>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index f714f87..23be3dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -668,6 +668,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_init_percpu_data(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp);
> static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp);
> static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void);
> static void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void);
> +static unsigned long rcu_rnp_online_cpus(struct rcu_node *rnp);
>
> #endif /* #ifndef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Eric
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-20 16:32 [PATCH] rcu: add missing prototype Eric Engestrom
2016-09-21 18:48 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160921184840.GD10850@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.engestrom@imgtec.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox