From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761726AbcIWRcK (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:32:10 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:37378 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758820AbcIWRcI (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:32:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:31:44 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: james.morse@arm.com, AKASHI Takahiro , Kees Cook , Andrew Morton , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , suzuki.poulose@arm.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , Ard Biesheuvel , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] thread_info: allow custom in-task thread_info Message-ID: <20160923173143.GA29830@leverpostej> References: <1473947349-14521-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1473947349-14521-3-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20160916103101.GA21702@leverpostej> <20160921102827.GC18176@leverpostej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:23:59PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Sep 21, 2016 12:28 AM, "Mark Rutland" wrote: > > Given all that, can we make the generic thread_info::flags an unsigned > > long, matching what the thread flag helpers implicitly assume? > > Yes. Want to send the patch or should I? I've sent a patch out to LKML [1], though if that doesn't look right I'm more than happy for you to send a correct one. ;) Thanks, Mark. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1474651447-30447-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com