From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935616AbcIWT7T (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:59:19 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f67.google.com ([209.85.218.67]:35247 "EHLO mail-oi0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933405AbcIWT7P (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:59:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:59:13 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / OPP: Multiple regulators aren't supported yet Message-ID: <20160923195913.GA12969@rob-hp-laptop> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:02:50PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Multiple regulators per device aren't supported yet by the kernel code > and the bindings provided in documentation aren't sufficient to handle > that case (as there is no way for kernel code to link multiple > voltage/current values to a power supply). What do you mean? Because the supplies are in the cpu node? Rob