From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Kill off show_stack() NULL-implies-current idiom
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 22:33:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160926213340.GA4137@remoulade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160926200136.sbltg4tp5uft4yfo@treble>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:01:36PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 04:16:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Today, show_stack() accepts a NULL task parameter, which it takes to mean the
> > current task. However, as noted in tip/x86/asm commit:
> >
> > 81539169f283329f ("x86/dumpstack: Remove NULL task pointer convention")
> >
> > ... having a NULL task parameter imply current leads to subtle bugs in stack
> > walking code (so far seen on both 86 and arm64), makes callsites harder to
> > read, and is unnecessary as all callers have access to current.
> >
> > As a step towards removing the problematic NULL-implies-current idiom entirely,
> > these patches ensure that generic code explictly passes current to
> > show_stack(), rather than relying on arch code to handle NULL.
>
> This is a good step, though it would be really nice to fix this
> tree-wide. Do you have any plans to do so?
FWIW, I completely agree, though I have no plans to do so currently.
I'd meant to Cc linux-arch for this series in order to make people aware,
though evidently I did not. I can Cc subsequent arm64 NULL-implies-current
cleanup patches there, if that's helpful?
> Regardless, for the series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cheers!
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-26 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-26 15:16 [PATCH 0/3] Kill off show_stack() NULL-implies-current idiom Mark Rutland
2016-09-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: document that show_stack() should not be passed a NULL task Mark Rutland
2016-09-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] drivers/tty: Explicitly pass current to show_stack Mark Rutland
2016-09-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] lib: dump_stack: explicitly " Mark Rutland
2016-09-26 20:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] Kill off show_stack() NULL-implies-current idiom Josh Poimboeuf
2016-09-26 21:33 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-09-27 17:57 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160926213340.GA4137@remoulade \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox