From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932973AbcI1Thl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:37:41 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:37227 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932392AbcI1The (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:37:34 -0400
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:37:31 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
        Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not decay new task load on first enqueue
Message-ID: <20160928193731.GD16071@codeblueprint.co.uk>
References: <20160923115808.2330-1-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <20160928101422.GR5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160928101422.GR5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+41 (02bc14ed1569) (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 28 Sep, at 12:14:22PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> Which suggests we do something like the below (not compile tested or
> anything, also I ran out of tea again).

I'm away on FTO right now. I can test this when I return on Friday.

Funnily enough, I now remember that I already sent a fix for the
missing update_rq_clock() in post_init_entity_util_avg(), but didn't
apply it when chasing this hackbench regression (oops),

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-3-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk