From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:45:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160929074543.5bb734af@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57EBDAFB.9060204@redhat.com>
Hi Doug,
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:00:11 -0400 Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> That doesn't seem like a particularly good thing to put in. Wouldn't
> you end up just reverting it later when they fix lustre? And are you
> going to revert the revert when it breaks again and revert the revert of
> the revert when it's fixed again? That just seems a lot of churn. I
> thought it was generally accepted that things in staging might or might
> not work and if they don't, we don't care? Am I wrong on that?
The allmodconfig build needs to work. Linus does an allmodconfig build
as part of his testing ...
Part of the fix patch should reenable building of the currently broken code.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 1:23 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 5:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 5:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 17:15 ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 1:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-28 15:00 ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 15:23 ` Greg KH
2016-09-28 15:26 ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 21:45 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-24 3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-24 8:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-02-26 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-26 3:04 ` Devesh Sharma
2020-02-26 17:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09 3:30 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 7:04 ` Mark Zhang
2019-07-09 7:18 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 13:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-10 1:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-10 4:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-16 23:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-17 6:33 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-07-17 7:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-08 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09 3:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-25 18:32 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-07-01 4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01 7:54 ` wangxi
2019-07-01 22:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 2:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-04 2:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 2:10 ` oulijun
2019-07-04 4:07 ` wangxi
2019-07-04 4:10 ` wangxi
2019-07-04 6:31 ` oulijun
2019-07-05 13:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 14:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04 0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04 1:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-04 9:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-07 2:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-05 12:25 ` Guy Levi(SW)
2018-12-05 22:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10 0:43 ` Changbin Du
2018-12-10 15:52 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-01-25 7:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25 8:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-01-25 16:08 ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-31 2:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 1:58 ` Joe Perches
2017-04-21 2:21 ` Doug Ledford
2017-04-21 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 2:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15 0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15 1:05 ` Doug Ledford
2017-02-15 5:09 ` Selvin Xavier
2016-03-16 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 6:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-03-16 19:02 ` Doug Ledford
2016-03-16 20:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 22:14 ` Ismail, Mustafa
2016-01-13 1:35 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160929074543.5bb734af@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).