From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751031AbcJAGIm (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2016 02:08:42 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:6361 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750771AbcJAGIh (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2016 02:08:37 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,277,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="15234289" Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 11:47:11 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Sinan Kaya Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, agross@codeaurora.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dan Williams , Wei Yongjun , Andy Shevchenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF Message-ID: <20161001061710.GF2467@localhost> References: <1475115167-5898-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1475115167-5898-5-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1475115167-5898-5-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:12:41PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > Configure the DMA bindings for the device tree based firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya > --- > drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > index 82f36e4..e8f6b84 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > @@ -375,8 +375,11 @@ static int __init hidma_mgmt_of_populate_channels(struct device_node *np) > ret = PTR_ERR(new_pdev); > goto out; > } > + of_node_get(child); > + new_pdev->dev.of_node = child; > of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > - > + of_msi_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > + of_node_put(child); should this be done unconditionally? Dont we needto call this only for platforms with msi? > kfree(res); > res = NULL; > } > -- > 1.9.1 > -- ~Vinod