From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752400AbcJCDaS (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:30:18 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:5393 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314AbcJCDaQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:30:16 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,287,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="768231332" Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:08:52 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Sinan Kaya Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, agross@codeaurora.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dan Williams , Wei Yongjun , Andy Shevchenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 04/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: configure DMA and MSI for OF Message-ID: <20161003033851.GP2467@localhost> References: <1475115167-5898-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1475115167-5898-5-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20161001061710.GF2467@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 10/1/2016 2:17 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:12:41PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > >> Configure the DMA bindings for the device tree based firmware. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya > >> --- > >> drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c | 5 ++++- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> index 82f36e4..e8f6b84 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > >> @@ -375,8 +375,11 @@ static int __init hidma_mgmt_of_populate_channels(struct device_node *np) > >> ret = PTR_ERR(new_pdev); > >> goto out; > >> } > >> + of_node_get(child); > >> + new_pdev->dev.of_node = child; > >> of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > >> - > >> + of_msi_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > >> + of_node_put(child); > > > > should this be done unconditionally? Dont we needto call this only for > > platforms with msi? > > I followed the pattern in of_platform_device_create_pdata function. of_msi_configure does > nothing if MSI is not enabled as irq_find_matching_host returns NULL. It didn't have any > side effects on my testing either. yeah later on I did look up the of_msi_configure() and I suspected this. I think it would be worthwhile to document this assumption here. Thanks -- ~Vinod