From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753742AbcJDNrE (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:47:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:32948 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753353AbcJDNrB (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:47:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:46:40 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Chanwoo Choi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Koz=C5=82owski?= , Kukjin Kim , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Krzysztof Kozlowski , jh80.chung@samsung.com, Seung-Woo Kim , Joonyoung Shim , Inki Dae , jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com, beomho.seo@samsung.com, jaewon02.kim@samsung.com, human.hwang@samsung.com, ideal.song@samsung.com, ingi2.kim@samsung.com, Marek Szyprowski , Andrzej Hajda , Sylwester Nawrocki , chanwoo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: dts: exynos: Add dts files for Samsung Exynos5433 64bit SoC Message-ID: <20161004134640.GA4150@kozik-lap> References: <1472046551-703-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <1472046551-703-6-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:37:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi > > > + cluster_a53_opp_table: opp_table0 { > > + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; > > + opp-shared; > > + > > + opp@400000000 { > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>; > > + opp-microvolt = <900000>; > > + }; > > With W=1: > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@400000000 has a > unit name, but no reg property AFAIR, there should be an exception for this... [1] But maybe it was not added after all? Best regards, Krzysztof [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-April/419738.html