From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754661AbcJEIzo (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:55:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:35145 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752105AbcJEIzm (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 04:55:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:25:36 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Lee Jones Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Mark Brown , Charles Keepax , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] mfd: wm8994-core: don't split lines unnecessarily Message-ID: <20161005085536.GC31416@vireshk-i7> References: <7d68a9e5dd338081342dd8b06310c2f3e61fccc0.1473996370.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20161003105615.GB4664@vireshk-i7> <20161004144131.GB29257@dell> <20161005003904.GC4664@vireshk-i7> <20161005084911.GG29257@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161005084911.GG29257@dell> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05-10-16, 09:49, Lee Jones wrote: > You are experienced enough to know better than this. :) > a) Contentless pings have never been acceptable. If you genuinely > think a patch has been forgotten you should resubmit with a > [RESEND]. That is their entire purpose. Sure, but I really believe a light *ping* is much better than a complete resend to start with. It generates far less noise. > b) You submitted this patch right at the end of the release cycle, and > your ping was sent during the merge-window. Most Maintainers, myself > included, like to have patches soak tested in -next for at least a > couple of weeks prior to acceptance. I agree to that, I sent it after rc6. I wasn't looking to get this merged during this cycle, but was wondering if it got missed or something like that. I still don't think that a simple Ping was that bad of an option, but its fine. Take your time to review this, no issues. Cheers. -- viresh