linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv2 3/7] printk: introduce per-cpu alt_print seq buffer
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 04:40:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161007194015.GB3496@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161006145656.GH13369@pathway.suse.cz>

On (10/06/16 16:56), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > there are many WARN_ON_* on
> > vprintk_alt()->alt_printk_log_store()->vsnprintf() path but they all
> > seem to be calling printk():
> > 
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE() from vsnprintf()
> > - WARN_ONCE() from vsnprintf()->format_decode()
> > - WARN_ON vsnprintf()->set_field_width()
> > - WARN_ON from vsnprintf()->set_precision()
> > - WARN_ON from vsnprintf()->pointer()->flags_string()
> > 
> > a side note, some of these WARNs are... 'funny'. e.g., to deadlock a
> > system it's enough to just pass an unsupported flag in format string.
> > vsnprintf() will
> >     WARN_ONCE(1, "Please remove unsupported %%%c in format string\n", *fmt)
> > 
> > but the problem is that we are already in printk():
> > 
> >    printk()
> >     raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock)
> >     text_len = vscnprintf(text, sizeof(textbuf), fmt, args)
> >                 WARN_ONCE(1, "Please remove unsupported ...)
> >                  printk()
> >                   raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock)			<< deadlock
> 
> Just for record. This vscnprintf() is called when logbuf_cpu is set.
> Therefore this particular recursion is not possible at the moment.

ah, indeed. thanks.

> Anyway, I agree that alt_printk_enter() calls might get nested.
> The direct vprintk_emit() calls are one reason. I guess that
> we will need to use the same counter/enter functions also
> for WARN_*DEFERRED(). And it would cause nesting as well.
> 
> Therefore we need to be careful about loosing the original
> value of irq flags.
> 
> The question is whether we need to store the flags in
> a per-CPU variable. We might also store it on the stack
> of the enter()/exit() function caller. I mean something like

yes, let's keep it on the stack. this particular implementation
was just an experiment, and I hate it. what I currently have in
my tree:

#define alt_printk_enter(flags)                 \
        do {                                    \
                local_irq_save(flags);          \
                __alt_printk_enter();           \
        } while (0)

#define alt_printk_exit(flags)                  \
        do {                                    \
                __alt_printk_exit();            \
                local_irq_restore(flags);       \
        } while (0)

	-ss

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-10  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-30 15:17 [RFC][PATCHv2 0/7] printk: use alt_printk to handle printk() recursive calls Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-09-30 15:17 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 1/7] printk: use vprintk_func in vprintk() Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-09-30 15:17 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 2/7] printk: rename nmi.c and exported api Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-09-30 15:17 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 3/7] printk: introduce per-cpu alt_print seq buffer Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-01  2:24   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-06 14:56     ` Petr Mladek
2016-10-07 19:40       ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2016-10-10 11:03         ` Petr Mladek
2016-10-06 13:08   ` Petr Mladek
2016-10-07 19:33     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-09-30 15:17 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 4/7] printk: make alt_printk available when config printk set Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-06 15:23   ` Petr Mladek
2016-10-07 19:08     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-09-30 15:17 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 5/7] printk: use alternative printk buffers Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-09-30 15:17 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 6/7] printk: report printk recursion from alt_printk flush Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-06 15:41   ` Petr Mladek
2016-10-07 18:59     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-10 11:02       ` Petr Mladek
2016-09-30 15:17 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 7/7] printk: remove zap_locks() function Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-06 15:55 ` [RFC][PATCHv2 0/7] printk: use alt_printk to handle printk() recursive calls Petr Mladek
2016-10-07 18:56   ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161007194015.GB3496@swordfish \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=calvinowens@fb.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).