From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753157AbcJLGIE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 02:08:04 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:47052 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752026AbcJLGHz (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 02:07:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:08:02 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: James Simmons Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Andreas Dilger , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Oleg Drokin , Bobi Jam , Jinshan Xiong , Lustre Development List Subject: Re: [PATCH 32/41] staging: lustre: llite: restart short read/write for normal IO Message-ID: <20161012060802.GA24118@kroah.com> References: <1475461717-21631-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <1475461717-21631-33-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <20161009141637.GA2092@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:22:35AM +0100, James Simmons wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 10:28:28PM -0400, James Simmons wrote: > > > From: Bobi Jam > > > > > > If normal IO got short read/write, we'd restart the IO from where > > > we've accomplished until we meet EOF or error happens. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bobi Jam > > > Signed-off-by: Jinshan Xiong > > > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6389 > > > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/14123 > > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger > > > Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin > > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/fail.c | 1 + > > > .../staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h | 2 + > > > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c | 41 ++++++++++++-------- > > > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_io.c | 19 ++++++++- > > > 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > Due to other changes in the filesystem tree, this patch no longer > > applies :( > > > > Can you rebase it and resend? > > How long will you be accepting patches to merge for? If its going > to be a few weeks like to just include the missing two patches with > the next batch. I don't understand the question. I always accept patches, no need to not send them, I'll queue them up to the proper branches as needed. So what do you mean here? > Another issue I need to look at is the IB changes. That's going to > require some heavy surgery to the ko2iblnd driver so its going to > take time for me to port this to the new RDMA RW api. That will > need to be push to linus so ko2iblnd can work with the 4.9 tree > if that is okay with you. Sure, send the patches, but maybe it is a 4.10 thing if it's too much work? thanks, greg k-h