From: Mikhail Golubev <golubev.mikhail@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: forest@alittletooquiet.net, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] staging:vt6656:baseband.h: fix function definition argument without identifier name issue
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:23:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013142345.GA17219@mike-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161013120602.GA13968@kroah.com>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:06:02PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:50:18PM +0300, Mikhail Golubev wrote:
> > Function definitions arguments should also have an identifier name as reported by checkpatch.pl.
>
> Please wrap your changelog comments at 72 columns.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Golubev <golubev.mikhail@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.h b/drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.h
> > index 7cc1387..fe1c25c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.h
> > @@ -86,15 +86,15 @@ struct vnt_phy_field {
> > unsigned int vnt_get_frame_time(u8 preamble_type, u8 pkt_type,
> > unsigned int frame_length, u16 tx_rate);
> >
> > -void vnt_get_phy_field(struct vnt_private *, u32 frame_length,
> > - u16 tx_rate, u8 pkt_type, struct vnt_phy_field *);
> > -
> > -void vnt_set_short_slot_time(struct vnt_private *);
> > -void vnt_set_vga_gain_offset(struct vnt_private *, u8);
> > -void vnt_set_antenna_mode(struct vnt_private *, u8);
> > -int vnt_vt3184_init(struct vnt_private *);
> > -void vnt_set_deep_sleep(struct vnt_private *);
> > -void vnt_exit_deep_sleep(struct vnt_private *);
> > -void vnt_update_pre_ed_threshold(struct vnt_private *, int scanning);
> > +void vnt_get_phy_field(struct vnt_private *priv, u32 frame_length,
> > + u16 tx_rate, u8 pkt_type, struct vnt_phy_field *phy);
> > +
>
> Really? Since when is this a coding style requirement?
>
This requirement is really new. It was proposed by Joe Perches at 26 Sep 2016:
[PATCH] checkpatch: Add warning for unnamed function definition.
Should this type of warnings be fixed here?
> Don't use --strict, it's not worth it for stuff like this, there are far
> worse-off files in drivers/staging/ than this one.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Best wishes,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 11:50 [PATCH] staging:vt6656:baseband.h: fix function definition argument without identifier name issue Mikhail Golubev
2016-10-13 12:06 ` Greg KH
2016-10-13 14:23 ` Mikhail Golubev [this message]
2016-10-13 14:57 ` Greg KH
2016-10-13 16:37 ` Joe Perches
2016-10-13 16:49 ` Greg KH
2016-10-13 16:56 ` Joe Perches
2016-10-14 8:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Mikhail Golubev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161013142345.GA17219@mike-ubuntu \
--to=golubev.mikhail@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=forest@alittletooquiet.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox