From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineethp@amazon.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kamatam@amazon.com, aliguori@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] namei: revert old behaviour for filename_lookup with LOOKUP_PARENT flag
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:24:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013212404.GU19539@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d487c39-25e9-2903-1fd9-ca6d870c0e7b@amazon.com>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:41:11PM -0700, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
> Yes, the use case is out-of-tree and the code snippet above depicts the use
> .
> Since kern_path_locked is also not exported, out-of-tree code used kern_path
> for the existence check for directories.
>
> One reference about this issue can be seen here.
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2459690?do=post_view_flat#2459690
... and in that thread I have asked for details and got no reply whatsoever.
> We also have a customer who complained about this functionality change.
>
> I understand that there has been no API promises been made to this API. But
> since this is an
> exported function, the change in function could cause break in out-of-tree
> kernel code. I will
> rephrase the commit message to say "change in functionality" instead of
> regression
In principle, I have no strong objections against exporting kern_path_locked,
provided it really matches what they (whoever they are) need. I'm still
curious about the context, though - what is that code trying to do? Depending
on the actual stuff it wants to implement, there might be better primitives
for doing that *and* there might be something worth adding and exporting
that would be a better match.
It's not that kern_path_locked() isn't a sane interface, but... using it
might be a sign of trying to work around something missing in API. So again,
please post more details.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 19:58 [PATCH] namei: revert old behaviour for filename_lookup with LOOKUP_PARENT flag Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2016-10-13 20:06 ` Al Viro
2016-10-13 20:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 20:26 ` Al Viro
2016-10-13 20:41 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2016-10-13 20:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 21:24 ` Al Viro [this message]
2016-10-13 22:14 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2016-10-13 23:31 ` Al Viro
2016-10-14 0:02 ` Remanan Pillai, Vineeth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161013212404.GU19539@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kamatam@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vineethp@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox