From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
jgross@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, richard@nod.at,
len.brown@intel.com, bp@suse.de, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/smp: Make the SMP boot message common on all arches
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:04:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161016070406.GA4211@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476348920-15066-1-git-send-email-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
* Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> Currently after bringing up secondary CPUs all arches print "Brought up
> %d CPUs". On x86 they also print the number of nodes that were brought
> online.
>
> It would be nice to also print the number of nodes on other arches.
> Although we could override smp_announce() on the other ~10 NUMA aware
> arches, it seems simpler to just always print the number of nodes. On
> non-NUMA arches there is just always 1 node.
>
> Having done that, smp_announce() is no longer weak, and seems small
> enough to just pull directly into smp_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 8 --------
> kernel/smp.c | 11 +++++------
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 42a93621f5b0..7eb8dfa56d34 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -821,14 +821,6 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
> return (send_status | accept_status);
> }
>
> -void smp_announce(void)
> -{
> - int num_nodes = num_online_nodes();
> -
> - printk(KERN_INFO "x86: Booted up %d node%s, %d CPUs\n",
> - num_nodes, (num_nodes > 1 ? "s" : ""), num_online_cpus());
> -}
> -
> /* reduce the number of lines printed when booting a large cpu count system */
> static void announce_cpu(int cpu, int apicid)
> {
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index bba3b201668d..6f5696d260c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -543,15 +543,11 @@ void __init setup_nr_cpu_ids(void)
> nr_cpu_ids = find_last_bit(cpumask_bits(cpu_possible_mask),NR_CPUS) + 1;
> }
>
> -void __weak smp_announce(void)
> -{
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Brought up %d CPUs\n", num_online_cpus());
> -}
> -
> /* Called by boot processor to activate the rest. */
> void __init smp_init(void)
> {
> unsigned int cpu;
> + int num_nodes;
>
> idle_threads_init();
> cpuhp_threads_init();
> @@ -564,8 +560,11 @@ void __init smp_init(void)
> cpu_up(cpu);
> }
>
> + num_nodes = num_online_nodes();
> + pr_info("smp: Brought up %d node%s, %d CPUs\n",
> + num_nodes, (num_nodes > 1 ? "s" : ""), num_online_cpus());
No objections - but pedantry requires me to mention that while we are evolving
this code and changing the strings I think we should make the CPU announcement
CPU%s smart as well: an SMP kernel on a single CPU bootup will result in
num_online_cpus() == 1, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-16 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 8:55 [PATCH 1/2] kernel/smp: Make the SMP boot message common on all arches Michael Ellerman
2016-10-13 8:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] kernel/smp: Tell the user we're bringing up secondary CPUs Michael Ellerman
2016-10-14 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] kernel/smp: Make the SMP boot message common on all arches Borislav Petkov
2016-10-26 5:32 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-10-16 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-10-26 5:34 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161016070406.GA4211@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).