From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754664AbcJQNM0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:12:26 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:33416 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752801AbcJQNLK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:11:10 -0400
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:10:41 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: ARM64-cpuinfo: Combine six calls for sequence output into one
 seq_printf() call in c_show()
Message-ID: <20161017131040.GH29095@leverpostej>
References: <83d98772-8872-1b75-a9a5-5f08b8462e18@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20161017105605.GB29095@leverpostej>
 <a09542e6-9851-45ef-583d-338205217cfc@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20161017123726.GE29095@leverpostej>
 <d012ad47-9688-5c9c-6ffd-78300c7b21ae@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d012ad47-9688-5c9c-6ffd-78300c7b21ae@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:50:57PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I prefer the code as-is. Unless there's a compelling reason to change it.
> 
> Is the chance for faster log output interesting enough?

Is there a particular user that cares today, or are we trying to work
backwards to a rationale?

Thanks,
Mark.