From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf bench futex: add NUMA support
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:01:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017150123.GA18595@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161017143821.GO12815@kernel.org>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:38:21AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:08:03PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior escreveu:
> > By default the application uses malloc() and all available CPUs. This
> > patch introduces NUMA support which means:
> > - memory is allocated node local via numa_alloc_local()
> > - all CPUs of the specified NUMA node are used. This is also true if the
> > number of threads set is greater than the number of CPUs available on
> > this node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/bench/Build | 4 ++
> > tools/perf/bench/futex-hash.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/Build b/tools/perf/bench/Build
> > index 60bf11943047..9e6e518d7d62 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/bench/Build
> > +++ b/tools/perf/bench/Build
> > @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> > +ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > +CFLAGS_futex-hash.o += -DCONFIG_NUMA=1
> > +endif
>
> Jiri, do we really need this? I.e. aren't the CONFIG_FOO defines
> available to tools?
not directly ATM.. it's prepared for the .config customary setting feature
meanwhile we set HAVE_* defines, like for CONFIG_NUMA we have:
-DHAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
you can check it in Makefile.config
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-16 19:08 [PATCH 1/2] perf bench futex: cache align the worer struct Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-16 19:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf bench futex: add NUMA support Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-17 14:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-17 15:01 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-10-17 15:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-17 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-19 18:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-19 18:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-21 2:34 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-21 3:03 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-18 1:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf bench futex: cache align the worer struct Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-19 13:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-19 17:59 ` [PATCH] perf/bench-futex: Avoid worker cacheline bouncing Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-19 18:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-19 18:41 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-24 19:06 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench futex: Cache align the worker struct tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161017150123.GA18595@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).