From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/18] x86/intel_rdt: Pick up L3/L2 RDT parameters from CPUID
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:06:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017180655.GB8999@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610171525390.9580@nanos>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:45:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * struct rdt_resource - attributes of an RDT resource
> > + * @enabled: Is this feature enabled on this machine
> > + * @name: Name to use in "schemata" file
> > + * @max_closid: Maximum number of CLOSIDs supported
> > + * @num_closid: Current number of CLOSIDs available
> > + * @max_cbm: Largest Cache Bit Mask allowed
> > + * @min_cbm_bits: Minimum number of bits to be set in a cache
>
> That should be 'number of consecutive bits', right?
Change to "Minimum number of consecutive bits to be set in a cache", is
that ok?
It's 2 on Haswell. It's 1 in other cases i.e. L3 on Broadwell and
Skylake servers etc.
>
> > + * bit mask
> > + * @domains: All domains for this resource
> > + * @num_domains: Number of domains active
> > + * @msr_base: Base MSR address for CBMs
> > + * @cdp_capable: Code/Data Prioritization available
> > + * @cdp_enabled: Code/Data Prioritization enabled
>
> I wonder whether this is the proper abstraction level. We might as well do
> the following:
>
> rdtresources[] = {
> {
> .name = "L3",
> },
> {
> .name = "L3Data",
> },
> {
> .name = "L3Code",
> },
>
> and enable either L3 or L3Data+L3Code. Not sure if that makes things
> simpler, but it's definitely worth a thought or two.
This way will be better than having cdp_enabled/capable for L3 and not
for L2. And this doesn't change current userinterface design either,
I think.
>
> > +#define for_each_rdt_resource(r) \
> > + for (r = rdt_resources_all; r->name; r++) \
> > + if (r->enabled)
>
> So the resource array must be NULL terminated, right? You might as well use
>
> r < rdt_resources_all + ARRAY_SIZE(rdt_resources_all)
>
> as the loop condition. So you avoid the NULL termination.
Will do.
>
> > +
> > +#define IA32_L3_CBM_BASE 0xc90
> > +extern struct rdt_resource rdt_resources_all[];
>
> Please visually split this. CBM_BASE has nothing to do with the resource
> array.
>
> > +#define domain_init(name) LIST_HEAD_INIT(rdt_resources_all[name].domains)
>
> name is really misleading here. Please use id and make this an inline
> function.
>
> > +struct rdt_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
>
> > static inline bool get_rdt_resources(void)
> > {
> > + struct rdt_resource *r;
> > bool ret = false;
> >
> > if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
> > @@ -74,20 +105,53 @@ static inline bool get_rdt_resources(void)
> >
> > if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RDT_A))
> > return false;
> > - if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3))
> > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3)) {
> > + union cpuid_0x10_1_eax eax;
> > + union cpuid_0x10_1_edx edx;
> > + u32 ebx, ecx;
> > +
> > + r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3];
> > + cpuid_count(0x00000010, 1, &eax.full, &ebx, &ecx, &edx.full);
> > + r->max_closid = edx.split.cos_max + 1;
> > + r->num_closid = r->max_closid;
> > + r->cbm_len = eax.split.cbm_len + 1;
> > + r->max_cbm = BIT_MASK(eax.split.cbm_len + 1) - 1;
> > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CDP_L3))
> > + r->cdp_capable = true;
> > + r->enabled = true;
> > +
> > ret = true;
> > + }
> > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CAT_L2)) {
> > + union cpuid_0x10_1_eax eax;
> > + union cpuid_0x10_1_edx edx;
> > + u32 ebx, ecx;
> > +
> > + /* CPUID 0x10.2 fields are same format at 0x10.1 */
> > + r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L2];
> > + cpuid_count(0x00000010, 2, &eax.full, &ebx, &ecx, &edx.full);
> > + r->max_closid = edx.split.cos_max + 1;
> > + r->num_closid = r->max_closid;
> > + r->cbm_len = eax.split.cbm_len + 1;
> > + r->max_cbm = BIT_MASK(eax.split.cbm_len + 1) - 1;
> > + r->enabled = true;
>
> Copy and paste is a wonderful thing, right?
>
> static void rdt_get_config(int idx, struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> union cpuid_0x10_1_eax eax;
> union cpuid_0x10_1_edx edx;
> u32 ebx, ecx;
>
> cpuid_count(0x00000010, idx, &eax.full, &ebx, &ecx, &edx.full);
> r->max_closid = edx.split.cos_max + 1;
> r->num_closid = r->max_closid;
> r->cbm_len = eax.split.cbm_len + 1;
> r->max_cbm = BIT_MASK(eax.split.cbm_len + 1) - 1;
> r->enabled = true;
> }
>
> and and the call site:
>
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3)) {
> rdt_get_config(1, &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3]);
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CDP_L3))
> r->cdp_capable = true;
> ret = true;
> }
>
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CAT_L2)) {
> rdt_get_config(2, &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L2]);
> ret = true;
> }
>
> Hmm?
Sure.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-15 2:12 [PATCH v4 00/18] Intel Cache Allocation Technology Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] Documentation, ABI: Add a document entry for cache id Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] cacheinfo: Introduce " Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] x86, intel_cacheinfo: Enable cache id in x86 Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] x86/intel_rdt: Feature discovery Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel resource allocation user interface Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add CONFIG, Makefile, and basic initialization Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add Haswell feature discovery Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 11:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] x86/intel_rdt: Pick up L3/L2 RDT parameters from CPUID Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 13:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 18:06 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2016-10-17 16:35 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 16:43 ` Yu, Fenghua
2016-10-17 20:20 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 16:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 16:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 17:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 21:22 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] x86/cqm: Move PQR_ASSOC management code into generic code used by both CQM and CAT Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] x86/intel_rdt: Build structures for each resource based on cache topology Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 14:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add basic resctrl filesystem support Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add "info" files to resctrl file system Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 19:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add mkdir " Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 21:50 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 22:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:00 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:10 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 23:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-18 1:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 23:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:37 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-18 2:56 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-18 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus file Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add tasks files Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 22:17 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add schemata file Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 22:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add scheduler hook Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for Intel RDT resource allocation Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161017180655.GB8999@linux.intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nilayvaish@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).