From: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Ander Conselvan de Oliveira"
<ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915: don't call drm_atomic_state_put on invalid pointer
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:29:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161018152908.GI3759@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161018151652.2690201-1-arnd@arndb.de>
On Tuesday, 2016-10-18 17:16:23 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The introduction of reference counting on the state structures caused
> sanitize_watermarks() in i915 to break in the error handling case,
> as pointed out by gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c: In function ‘intel_modeset_init’:
> include/drm/drm_atomic.h:224:2: error: ‘state’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>
> This changes the function back to only drop the reference count
> when it was successfully allocated first.
>
> Fixes: 0853695c3ba4 ("drm: Add reference counting to drm_atomic_state")
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 6d168685bbda..6a26da143aa6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -16314,7 +16314,7 @@ static void sanitize_watermarks(struct drm_device *dev)
> * BIOS-programmed watermarks untouched and hope for the best.
> */
> WARN(true, "Could not determine valid watermarks for inherited state\n");
> - goto fail;
> + goto put_state;
> }
>
> /* Write calculated watermark values back */
> @@ -16325,8 +16325,9 @@ static void sanitize_watermarks(struct drm_device *dev)
> dev_priv->display.optimize_watermarks(cs);
> }
>
> -fail:
> +put_state:
> drm_atomic_state_put(state);
> +fail:
> drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
> drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
> }
> --
> 2.9.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-18 15:16 [PATCH] i915: don't call drm_atomic_state_put on invalid pointer Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 15:29 ` Eric Engestrom [this message]
2016-10-18 15:56 ` Chris Wilson
2016-10-19 7:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161018152908.GI3759@imgtec.com \
--to=eric.engestrom@imgtec.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox