From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965201AbcJSBzW (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:55:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:33087 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965055AbcJSBy7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:54:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:54:52 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Petr Mladek , Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , Calvin Owens , Thomas Gleixner , Mel Gorman , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv3 1/6] printk: use vprintk_func in vprintk() Message-ID: <20161019015452.GE513@swordfish> References: <20161018154045.7364-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20161018154045.7364-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20161018124905.1c1b6291@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161018124905.1c1b6291@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (10/18/16 12:49), Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:40:40 +0900 > Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > vprintk(), just like printk(), better be using per-cpu printk_func > > instead of direct vprintk_emit() call. Just in case if vprintk() > > will ever be called from NMI, or from any other context that can > > deadlock in printk(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt Thanks. -ss