From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934273AbcJTMfQ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:35:16 -0400
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:50512 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932165AbcJTMfP (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:35:15 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,371,1473145200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="181856516"
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:35:10 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI / gpio: Updates to properties
Message-ID: <20161020123510.GH24289@lahna.fi.intel.com>
References: <20160923145710.105489-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <20161019124112.GK1722@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <CAJZ5v0j7EfMEjb7F4BMR7O2_U0oipvcMDMf0N4XEoem4ypqE7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdZZOzbrckz79uS1febA69eJrbTGON3FkuGUBWcw2-zkcw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZZOzbrckz79uS1febA69eJrbTGON3FkuGUBWcw2-zkcw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:17:40PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Mika Westerberg
> 
> >> Any comments on the GPIO patches in this series?
> >>
> >> At least the last one does not add any new bindings so it should be fine
> >> to apply.
> >
> > I have no comments, but I'd suggest resending them as a new series on
> > top of 4.9-rc1 (which includes the generic patches from this series).
> >
> > You can add my ACK to them if that helps.
> 
> OK I had some comments so please adress these but resend on top
> of v4.9-rc1 indeed. If they are already higher up in my mailbox then
> look into my comments and post again, hehe.

I will, thanks!